Infographics: Why we say NO to ACTA?
We designed this infographics about ACTA, remixing some of Nina Paley's characters, based on information published in LQDN, EFF, Michael Geist, World Bank, Nación Red y Manzana Mecánica.
This english version is a draft! leave your comment or contact me to submit corrections and observations!. Editable resources, and plain text file at the end of post. Share, remix and enjoy! (spanish original here)
Juliet thanks for amendments! :)

Graphics credits
Mimi & Eunice and other cartoon characters by Nina Paley remixed by derechoaleer.org
Data Sources:
General information: La Quadrature du Net, Michael Geist y Electronic Frontier Foundation, Nación Red, Manzana Mecánica.
The World Bank: Royalty and license fees, receipts: Royalty and license fees are payments and receipts between residents and nonresidents for the authorized use of intangible, nonproduced, nonfinancial assets and proprietary rights (such as patents, copyrights, trademarks, industrial processes, and franchises) and for the use, through licensing agreements, of produced originals of prototypes (such as films and manuscripts). Data are in current U.S. dollars.
"Piracy" as a social phenomenon: "The Copy Culture Survey - Copyright Infringement and Enforcement in the US" and "The Media Piracy Report" by Social Research Science Research y The American Assembly.
Editable files
Vectors: Inkscape SVG editable file: acta_mae-en-02.svgz
Text: Plain text file: Why_we_say_NO_to_ACTA-en-02.txt
Fonts: Nina Font TrueType and FontForge resources for many west european languages (partial ISO-8859-1 character set): nina-dal.tar.gz (“Nina” Font now Free) / "OSP DIN" osp-din-ttf.zip (sources - OSP) / "My World" my_world.zip (dafont).
More ACTA infographics
http://derechoaleer.org/2012/03/infographics-why-we-say-no-acta.html
publicado por NDH in 1330726646












Comentarios
#1 <3
<3
#2 Hmm in the "Nobody voted for
Hmm in the "Nobody voted for them" bloc:
"...that will have a very concrete to people" doesn't mean anything.
I suppose you meant something like
"...that will have a very concrete effect on people" ?
#3 Oh, disregard previous
Oh, disregard previous comment, I should have reloaded the page first since it's already fixed.
Though something that's not yet fixed : French acronyms of WIPO and WTO are used in places (OMPI & OMC). Seems inconsistent.
#4 WIPO & OMPI
mmu_man you are right!
thanks for amendments :)
#5 Pingback
desde politiquedunetz.sploing.fr -- 1331493100#6 Pingback
desde www.derechoaleer.org -- 1332864075Enviar un comentario